Category: Technology

  • No Real Use for Google Wave?

    I can’t seem to think of a very practical use for Google Wave. IMHO it’s a technology that’s neither here nor there. It’s not a very effective replacement for e-mail either as it’s not a scalable model. It’s not exactly a great collaborative tool as well though I agree maybe it has good use for taking meeting minutes and random notes. It’s certainly not a good file sharing or document editing tool.

    I’ve been thinking quite a bit on what I can really do with Wave. It’s frustrating actually 😛

    On a side note, it’s surprising how the ancient DNS and SMTP protocols we take for granted scaled so well. IETF and IEEE are a bunch of geniuses.

  • World Class Troubleshooting

    I’m sitting in a client’s office and just two cubicles away, this guy is on the phone with another guy trying to troubleshoot something.

    “Hello? Yah, yah? What is wrong?”

    Few seconds later…

    “Oh, can you go inside? Erm… edit the file?”

    Few seconds later…

    “Yah, use pico open the file.”

    One or two seconds later…

    “Pico don’t have? What you use? Nano? Don’t use nano. You try pico?”

    Few seconds later…

    “No pico? Install pico and try?”

    Few seconds later…

    “OK, you call back. Yah. OK, thanks, bye.”

    So he concluded the guy used the wrong editor? 😛 Few minutes later, he makes a call to someone else.

    “Hi, yah, er, ask you ah, how you see the Linux is 386 or 686 or x64?”

    Two seconds later..

    “Oh like that ah. Use you-name lah. OK. Then, then… like that I cannot install the 386 on 64bit lah?”

    Wahlaueh, it drives me nuts just listening to the conversation 😛 Heng I don’t have to work with these people.

  • Causes App Critique

    Before I joined the CS3216 class, I promised Prof. Ben I will do his homework, so I decided I should really do it. Here’s my critique. To save him the agony, I have decided not to write a thesis and keep it short. 😛

    Anyway…

    So what is Causes?

    Technical description. It’s an application in Facebook that allows a user to make a difference by donating to a cause.

    Non-technical description. It’s something in Facebook that allows people to make a difference by donating to a cause.

    Hokay, enough of rubbish. So Causes aims to solve some problems, and in my opinion it is well positioned to solve what is known as the Social & Economic Injustice.

    Socially and economically, we have created great disparities of wealth. A minority of the world’s population (17%) consume most of the world’s resources (80%), leaving almost 5 billion people to live on the remaining 20%. As a result, billions of people are living without the very basic necessities of life – food, water, housing and sanitation.

    If the top 20% of the world’s population is 1.2 billion, then I am quite confident that Facebook users are amongst the top 5% (~300 million).

    The problem with traditional forms of donation

    The problem with traditional forms of donation are that they lack public visibility and transparency on a global scale. NPOs depend highly on volunteers to do all sorts of things like donation drives to keep them alive. There aren’t many self-sustainable foundations like Bill and Melinda Gates around. And if you haven’t forgotten the NKF saga where the infamous quote on peanuts came about, it’s obvious that we don’t really know where the money goes.

    Basic Concepts

    • The Power to Make a Difference as a Social Media. This app basically demonstrates the power of social media and that it should not be underestimated. As of this writing, the Hope for Haiti Now cause has raised US$42,930 (S$60,617).
    • The Power to Make a Difference as an Individual. Unlike traditional donations (I’m referring to the tin-can school boys and girls at MRT stations), this app allows you ample time to search for a cause that you think really matters (than somebody preaching some unknown cause to you), read all about it before you donate. The best part is that it shows you the total amount (transparency) and others who have donated (confidence).
    • Transparency. This app seems to have done a good job by naming the beneficary organization (usually registered in the US) and by reflecting the total amount donated. However, the same old problem still exists – we don’t know where the money goes.

    Technical Concepts

    • Main Navigation. Simplicity is the key. The adaptation of the Facebook UI is great, making it look clean. If you haven’t realized, clicking on Best Of brings you out of Facebook to www.causes.com which completely copied Facebook’s top bar.
    • Front Page. It seems like the front page of the Causes app has a similar concept to BOOMZcart. It recommends you potential causes and also shows the causes that your friends are participating in, but there’s some issues I observed.
      • The recommendations don’t seem to match any of my profile interests. Is it a targeted recommendation, or a random recommendation?
      • I see four causes, but they’re all the same person. It should show four unique friends instead.
    • Individual Cause Page. In my opinion this has been very well executed by mimicking Facebook’s user profile page. It provides user interaction (via Home tab), sufficient details (via About and Impact tabs), network information (via Members tab).
    • Browse Causes. Under the Find Causes navigation menu. It’s broken (returns empty page).

    Food for Thought

    • Show me the money. Beneficiary organizations should provide detailed breakdown of where the donation money went. I’m not sure if this information is easy to obtain as I’m not a US citizen.
    • Real People, Real Responses. What if somebody from the Haiti earthquake came in and said, “Thank you for your donations. My family survived the ordeal.” I would hope this to happen.

    P.S. Sorry I wrote this post in a rush and it looks abit random with broken sentences and such. Hope you can understand what I’m writing 😛

  • Not Being a Good Student

    I’m not really graded, so this means I can be a bit pai kia and not blog on a specific app that was presented. Unfortunately, I’m not 14 years old.

    To be honest, I didn’t do anything for the Facebook Application Seminar project, that’s why I decided to do some community service and take photos instead. The project discussions were done over the weekend and I was packed with all the random things to do, like visiting the in-laws, visiting my parents, attending KHCO‘s 35th Anniversary dinner and of course spending time with my wife who’s almost about to twist my ears off for reaching home past midnight this morning. What’s with women and being alone at home? 😛

    Dr. Ben Leong wrapping up the class.

    I’m very impressed by all the presentations yesterday. To be honest, they are way better than about 90% of the business presentations I’ve seen. BTW, what’s that tool that some teams were using? It’s like a huge template that’s sliding around. It’s not PowerPoint – it looks web based. Somebody please enlighten me.

    Basically as many have observed, the most popular apps might not be the prettiest or the easiest. There’s many factors around which an app can be successful. It is important that CS3216 students see beyond their academic scope and realize that the world is not so simple. Jonathan’s presentation made this point even more obvious.

    Jonathan Low on scams.

    Unfortunately for the most of us who believe in doing good, doing business is not really the same. It’s quite a tough balance of being God and Satan. Why? I think because humans are selfish in one way or another – it’s our natural survival instinct!

    Just to cite an example. Google is well known for it’s motto “Don’t be Evil“. However AdWords survived quite a while with click fraud until they got sued. It’s not entirely their fault – they didn’t do it deliberately – but they knew it was happening and was making them money, so they didn’t really stop the fraudsters; not at least until they got their ass under fire.

    Cedric on prediction markets.

    The second part that got me thinking was the presentation on Prediction Markets. Facebook has over 300 million users. Although this is not larger than the population of China or India, it is certainly a substantial population where a good sampling of information can be obtained. If there’s a great app to build, it would be one that analyzes social behavior for market intelligence. Food for thought.

  • New glibc in CentOS 5.4 breaks VMware Server 2.x

    I’ve been puzzled for quite a while now why the web UI keeps crashing on one of my VMware servers here, and I finally decided to kick my lazy ass and get down to work.

    I found out that it was the vmware-hostd process that hosts the web UI ports (HTTP on TCP/8222 and HTTPS on TCP/8333). A quick search on Google gave me just what I was looking for.

    So it seems the new glibc version in CentOS 5.4 breaks VMware Server 2. If you’ve already upgraded your server, here’s how you can downgrade glibc:

    • Go to /etc/yum.repos.d
    • Make a copy of CentOS-Base.repo to CentOS-5.3-Base.repo
    • Edit CentOS-5.3-Base.repo and rename all the headings in the [brackets], e.g. [base] -> [base53]
    • Do a search and replace all $releasever with 5.3
    • Save the file
    • Run yum clean all then run yum downgrade glibc glibc-common
    • You’ll also need to re-run vmware-config.pl
    • After the downgrade is done, edit /etc/yum.conf and add exclude=glibc glibc-common glibc-devel glibc-headers glibc-utils nscd on a new line to avoid future update issues, at least until VMware decides to fix it.
  • Second Thoughts on the Apple iPad

    Before I slept last night, I thought, “Apple ain’t stupid.” They wouldn’t do something like not install OS X, so I went to bed, tossed and turned a bit, woke up this morning and saw some light.

    The iPad (urgh, I just feel wrong typing this name) is essentially a full screen touch device. Actually, they aren’t the first to build such devices. Tablets have been around for a while, and they weren’t very successful in selling. What was the problem?

    Windows. When Microsoft designed Vista, they had touch devices in mind, that’s why the sideways expanding Start Menu disappeared and was replaced with a scrolling design with larger icons. The user interface also had larger scrollbars and minimize/maximize/close buttons.

    But that was not the point. PC software was not built for touch devices in mind. Not that Microsoft designed Windows badly, but developers will naturally build apps for the larger majority – the regular PCs driven by a mouse and keyboard.

    So I think you get the idea now. Apple have had great success with the iPhone/iPod Touch’s software model and created the new multi-touch interface paradigm. They’re bringing this wisdom to the new iPad. If they had put OS X on this thing, people would go around installing regular OS X software and the user experience would be completely messed up – imagine hideous titlebars in the Aqua UI just so you can touch the minimize/maximize buttons.

    I’m going to bet my hard earned money on this one and buy an iPad when it’s launched.

    BTW if you read this post on Gizmodo, I’d agree no multitasking sucks, but the comment on the ugly bezel is irrelevant – you need a place to hold the iPad without interfering with the touch sensitive areas of the screen.